Flagship Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra, through Rural Development and Water Management Dept and Ors.

¶1

Sr.No.16

¶2

WP 6935 & 6929.14

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6935 OF 2014

¶4

Flagship Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and anr. ..Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & ors. ..Respondent

¶5

with WRIT PETITION NO. 6929 OF 2014

¶6

Matrix Deveopers Pvt. Ltd. and anr. ..Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & ors. ..Respondent

¶7

Mr. Riyaz Chagla along with Mr. S. R. Wagmare, advocate for the petitioners.

¶8

Mr. C.G. Gavnekar with Mr. G. S. Hiranandani i/b. Suhas S. Deokar, advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶9

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & RANJIT MORE, J J.

¶10

DATE : 18^th APRIL, 2016.

¶11

P. C. :

¶12

After arguing for some time, Mr. Chagla, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be given liberty to file a complaint under Section 124(6) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act to the State Government and the State Government may be directed to take an appropriate decision of the said complaint as expeditiously as possible.

¶13

Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

¶14

Sr.No.16

¶15

WP 6935 & 6929.14

¶16

Having regard to the aforesaid limited prayer, we are disposing of these petitions with liberty to the petitioners to submit complaint as provided under Section 124(6) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act within two weeks from today. On receipt of such complaint, the State Government shall consider and take appropriate decision on it in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and preferably within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the same.

¶17

Certified copy as per Rules.

¶18

[RANJIT MORE, J.] [SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]

¶19

Shubhada S Kadam 2/2

Flagship Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra, through Rural Development and Water Management Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Flagship Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra, through Rural Development and Water Management Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Bandgar Iragonda Raosaheb and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shri. Sudhakar Pandurang Tandel Vs Thane Municipal Corporation through Its Commissioner and Ors.

Shri. Narendra Atmaram Patil and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School Education Dept and Ors.

Flora Lalitkumar Shah Vs the President/ Secretary and 4 Ors.

Vijay Baburao Ghuge Vs Vice Chancellor University of Pune and Ors.

Smt. Ranjana Vinod Kejriwal Vs Mr. Omprakash L. Changoiwal and Ors.