Petitioner sought directions to decide a pending appeal. The High Court directed the Divisional Commissioner to decide the appeal within six months after providing a hearing, then disposed of the writ petition.
Direction to Respondent No.3 to decide appeal No.39/2016 within six months after hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
10 WRIT PETITION NO. 6764 OF 2016
INDUBAI RAMA ALIAS BHIKA BHILL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. G.A. Nagori AGP for Respondents: Mr. P.S. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.7 :Mr. G.V. Wani
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ. Date: July 04, 2016 ...
PER COURT :-
1 This petition can be disposed of by issuing direction to Respondent No.3 Divisional Commissioner, Nasik to decide the appeal bearing No.39/2016, presented by the petitioner, pending before the concerned authority, as expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from today, in accordance with provisions of law and after extending opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned and it is accordingly directed.
( K.L. WADANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can issue a direction to decide a pending appeal expeditiously without adjudicating merits of the petition itself.
INDUBAI RAMA ALIAS BHIKA BHILL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
R. M. BORDE
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
