Petitioner sought to withdraw the criminal writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty as prayed, reserving opinion on maintainability without expressing any view on maintainability.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 28-crwp656.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 656 OF 2016
MOHD IFRAN ABDUL MANNAN GHONGADE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MHARASHTRA
Mr.S.S.Deshmukh, advocate for Applicants
Mr.S.B.Joshi, APP for respondent no.1
Mr.G.R.Syed, Advocate for respondent no.2
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 26, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard.
2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner,
on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this
petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
3.The petition stands dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, we
make it clear that we have not expressed any
2 28-crwp656.odt
opinion about maintainability of the petition/
proceedings, which may be filed by the present
petitioner taking exception to the decision taken
by the learned Advocate General.
4.List the other petitions for admission in
due course.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.][S.S. SHINDE, J.]
kbp
MOHD IFRAN ABDUL MANNAN GHONGADE
THE STATE OF MHARASHTRA
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court