Maharashtra Wine Merchants Association v. the Collector of Palghar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
649.15 as.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k
1/2
55 civ wp 649.15 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.649 OF 2015
Maharashtra Wine Merchants' Association ….. Petitioners V/s The Collector of Palghar & Ors. ….. Respondents
Ms. Veena Thadhani for the Petitioner.
Mr. Manish Pabale, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 10 OCTOBER 2016
ORDER:
Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. The Petition is filed on behalf of the Maharashtra Wine Merchants' Association. The Petitioner has claimed to have filed this Petition on behalf of licence holders (total 4) whose names are appearing in the list Exhibit-A. There is no averment in the Petition that the said 4 alleged members of the Petitioner had expressly authorized the Petitioner to file this Petition on their behalf. There is no resolution produced along with the Petition to show that the said 4 members have in any manner consented to the Petitioner filing the Petition on their behalf. In the
1/2
k
2/2
55 civ wp 649.15 as.doc
circumstances, we decline to entertain this Petition and the same is disposed of. To enable the aggrieved parties to file Petitions, ad-interim relief which is operative till today is extended by a period of six weeks from today.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
katkam
2/2
Maharashtra Wine Merchants' Association
The Collector of Palghar
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court