Arvind Singh Gahlot and 21 Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed by the Bombay High Court as it was rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 645 OF 2015
Dr.Arvind Singh Gahlot and ors. .. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Fauzan i/b Mr.P.V. Thorat, for the Petitioners. Mr.J.S.Saluja, AGP for Respondents No.1 to 3.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2016
P.C. :
. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that this
Petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Dr. Arvind Singh Gahlot and ors.
State of Maharashtra and ors.
SHANTANU S KEMKAR
M S KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court