The petitioner challenged her detention under a writ petition. The petition was disposed of as infructuous because the order of detention was revoked by the Respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.No.644/2016(901)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 644 OF 2016
Seema Kailash Makhija ...Petitioner (wife of detenu) Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. V.B. Singh for the Petitioner Mrs. Madhavi Mhatre APP for the State
CORAM : V.M.KANADE &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 22ND MARCH, 2016
P.C. :
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (V.M.KANADE, J.)
Seema Kailash Makhija
State of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
