Court directs respondent authorities to decide villagers' application for a fair price shop within nine months. The writ petition of Tuljabhavani Mahila Bachat Gat is disposed of as merits are not examined.
Directing respondent authorities to take decision on villagers application expeditiously and within nine months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 6324.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6324 OF 2013
Tuljabhavani Mahila Bachat Gat .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Sudhir G. Bhalerao, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri N. B. Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 22ND JUNE, 2016.
PER COURT :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, application/representation has been given by the villagers for starting the fair price shop at village Pimpladevi.
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/June 16
Tuljabhavani Mahila Bachat Gat
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
K. K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
