The Court dismissed the petition for quashing the FIR and discontinued the related criminal application, holding that subsequent filing of the charge sheet rendered the petition unentertained, keeping contentions open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crwp-631.14.odt
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.631 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.204 OF 2014
Arun Ramchandra Mishra and Ors. … Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents
Mr. S.R. Patel for the Petitioners. Mr. S.V. Saste, APP for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & R.D. DHANUKA, JJ.
DATE : 6th SEPTEMBER, 2016
P.C.
1 In this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the prayer is for quashing the FIR. Criminal Application No.204 of 2014 shows that even charge sheet has been filed. Today, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that the trial Court has framed charge.
2 In view of the subsequent events, this Petition for quashing the FIR cannot be entertained. However, remedies of the Petitioners are kept open. The contentions raised in the Petition are kept open. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. Criminal Application No.204 of 2014 does not survive and the same is disposed of.
1 of 1
Arun Ramchandra Mishra and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
