Writ petition filed by Vijaya Subhash Bagul was dismissed simplicitor as withdrawn by the petitioner without imposing costs, despite respondent counsel opposition.
Petitioner granted permission to withdraw petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6230 OF 2015
VIJAYA SUBHASH BAGUL VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Dhananjay B Thoke Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 : Mr. S.V. Adwant.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE :25TH JULY , 2016.
PER COURT:
1] Mr. Thoke, learned counsel for petitioner on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
2] Mr. Advant, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 opposes the said request and submits that heavy cost be imposed upon the petitioner as various litigations are filed by the petitioner and the bank is harassed.
3] We would have considered the request of the respondents, had we issued notices to the respondents and would have dealt with the matter on merits. As withdrawal simplicitor is sought, and withdrawal amounts to dismissal of the petition, so also, no notices were issued by this Court, we are not inclined to impose costs.
4] Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
[K.K. SONAWANE] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
VIJAYA SUBHASH BAGUL
THE UNION OF INDIA
OTHERS
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
