This court directed the disciplinary authority to conclude the pending departmental enquiry against the petitioner within three months and dispose of the writ petition.
Director of Commissioner to conclude enquiry and pass final order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp6219.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6219 OF 2016
Shankar s/o Digambar Jadhav .. PETITIONER VERSUS The Director of Commissioner & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. A.A. Mukhedkar, advocate for petitioner. Mr. A.S. Shinde, AGP for the State. Mr. V.P. Golewar, advocate for respondent no. 3. Mr. R.S. Shinde, advocate for respondent no. 4.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 1st DECEMBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
It is the contention of petitioner that departmental enquiry was initiated against him in January 2014 and it is not yet concluded. It is further informed that almost all the proceedings are over and the report has already been submitted by the Enquiry Officer to the disciplinary authority.
In the facts of this case, we direct respondent no. 2 to conclude the enquiry proceeding and pass final order as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from today and, it is accordingly directed. Writ petition stands disposed of.
( SANGITRAO S. PATIL ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the disciplinary authority is directed to conclude the pending departmental enquiry expeditiously.
Shankar s/o Digambar Jadhav
The Director of Commissioner
others
R.M. BORD
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
