Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous on instructions from advocates. No substantive reasoning was provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SPB/
1/1 33wp6141-14f.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6141 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP for the State.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 04th MARCH, 2016
P.C. :
The learned counsel for appearing for the Petitioners, on instructions, states that this Petition has become infructuous.
The Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(A.A.SAYED,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)
NARESH H. PATIL
A. A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
