Disposed

Pandurang Bandu Bhalerao v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC20 Jun 2016WP/6099/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging encroachment on 5 R. land reserved for a Matang community grave yard was disposed of by direct leave. The court directed authorities to remove any encroachment upon finding the same, noting the private suit had excluded this specific area.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to take steps to remove any encroachment over the land reserved for the Matang community grave yard.

Pandurang Bandu Bhalerao Vs the State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 WP6099.13

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 6099 OF 2013

¶4

Pandurang S/o. Bandu Bhalerao .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Revenue and Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others .. Respondents

¶5

Shri Chandrakant V. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioner. Smt. A. V. Gondhalekar, A. G. P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Shri S. G. Thombre, Advocate for the Respondent No. 6.

¶6

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 20TH JUNE, 2016.

¶7

PER COURT :-

¶8

Mr. Thombre, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 5 R. land out of Gut No. 247 is reserved for Grave Yard of Matang community. According to the learned counsel, the Respondent No. 6 has made an encroachment over the said area. The Respondent No. 6 had filed a civil suit before the C. J. S. D., Aurangabad bearing No. 359 of 2008. The said suit is decreed to the extent of other area except 5 R. land which is reserved for Matang community. The learned counsel submits that, the said judgment has been made final, however, the Respondent No. 6 has encroached over the said area and no steps are being taken by the authorities concerned.

¶9

2 WP6099.13

¶10

Mr. S. G. Thombre, the learned counsel for the Respondent No. 6 submits that, the petitioner nor any other person is concerned with land Gut No. 247 except an area of 5 R. land from the southern side. According to the learned counsel, the Respondent No. 6 is not encroaching upon the said area of 5 R. meant for the Grave Yard.

¶11

The learned A. G. P. states that, the injunction order is operating in favour of the Respondent No. 6 for an area excluding 5 R. land meant for the Grave Yard. Even, mutation entry is also recorded.

¶12

4. We have considered the submissions.

¶13

The parties are ad idem about the land being reserved for Grave Yard meant for Matang community. The said area of 5 R. certainly cannot be used nor encroached by the Respondent No. 6. Even, the Respondent No. 6 has made a statement that, the Respondent No. 6 has not encroached the said area nor is intending to encroach said area.

¶14

In light of the above premise, in case, the Respondents / Authorities find encroachment over the land reserved for Grave Yard of Matang community the Respondents shall take steps to remove the said encroachment.

¶15

7. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

¶16

[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]

¶17

sam/June.16

Pandurang Bandu Bhalerao v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pandurang Bandu Bhalerao v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Rana Sahebrao Mannuram through Its Partner Anil Jagannath Rana Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Balu Karbhari Ranmale and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shaikh Hamid Shaikh Rahim Vs State of Maharashtra and Another

Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Magasvargiya Kashtakari Sahkari Griha Nirman Society Ltd, Aurangabad Vs State of Maharashtra and Another

Sudhakar Vishnupant Subhedar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shahada Taluka Co-Operative Education Society Limited Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others