The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench dismissed a criminal writ petition challenging an order denying parole, holding that the parole period had not expired.
Rejected application for parole and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.4.CWP.60.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 60 OF 2016. (Rama Kishor Sahankar .vs. The Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur & another)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. G.S. Agrawal, Advocate (appointed) for petitioner, Mr. J.Y. Ghurde, A.P.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. DATED : APRIL 25, 2016.
Since the period of one year from the date on which the parole was granted on earlier occasion is yet to expire, we find no error in the impugned order rejecting application for parole. The Writ Petition is rejected.
Fees payable to the learned Counsel appointed for the petitioner are quantified at Rs.1500/-.
Judge
Judge
J.
Rama Kishor Sahankar
The Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur
B.R. Gavai
Mrs. Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
