The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad) disposed of WP 5891 of 2016 directing respondent No. 2 to decide the petitioner's representation on merits within 12 weeks.
Respondent No. 2 to decide the petitioner's representation on merits within 12 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 5891.2016.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5891 OF 2016
LAXUMAN JALBAJI WAVHALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr S M Kulkarni AGP for Respondents: Mr P N Kutti Mr S P Katneshwarkar h/f Mr. S.G.Sangle for respondent no.2.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: July 13, 2016
PER COURT :-
petition is disposed of with directions to respondent no.2 to decide said representation of the petitioner on its
2 WP 5891.2016.odt
own merits, as expeditiously as possible, within 12 (twelve) weeks from today, if already not decided. Petition stands disposed of in above terms.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
aaa/-
…
Laxuman Jalbaji Wavhale
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 2
S.S. Shinde
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
