Disposed

Nilgar Denyati Sanstha, Solapur and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC20 Jul 2016WP/5883/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging non-incorporation of acquirer's name in revenue record despite land acquisition. Court directed petitioners to approach a committee constituted under a circular dated 13/2/2015 for redressal.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioners to approach the committee constituted vide circular dated 13/2/2015 by filing application/representation.

Nilgar Denyati Sanstha, Solapur and Another Vs State of… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 WP/ 5883 /2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 5883 OF 2015

¶4

Nilgar Denyati Sanstha and anr.

¶5

.. Petitioners

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and others

¶8

.. Respondents

¶9

Mr. A.V. Indrale Patil, Advocate for the petitioners
Ms. S.S. Raut, AGP for the respondent Nos.1,2,4 and 5
Mr. K.K. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent no.3
Mr. N.V. Gaware, Advocate for respondent nos.6 and 7

¶10

 CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA &
 K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
 DATE : 20/07/2016

¶11

ORAL ORDER:

¶12

Heard.

¶13

2.The grievance of the petitioners is that though

¶14

the land has been acquired, name of the
Government/Municipal Council is not incorporated in the
revenue record. The petitioner is beneficiary of

¶15

allotment of plots, however as the name of the
Government itself is not incorporated, the petitioners
are not in a position to utilize the land.

¶16

2 WP/ 5883 /2015

¶17

3.Mr. Gaware, learned counsel for respondent

¶18

nos.6 and 7 submits that though second appeal is

¶19

withdrawn, one suit is filed and the same is pending.

¶20

respondent/State and Mr. Kulkarni for respondent no.3.

¶21

5.Learned A.G.P. states that for meeting out the
grievance of such nature, a committee is constituted by
the Additional Commissioner vide circular dated
13/2/2015.

¶22

6.In light of the above, the petitioners may
approach the committee constituted vide circular dated
13/2/2015 by filing application/representation, which
shall be considered by the committee on its own merits
expeditiously, preferably within six (6) months from the

¶23

date of receipt of the application. The interested
parties are entitled to represent themselves before the
Committee.

¶24

7.Writ Petition disposed of. No costs.

¶25

arp/

Nilgar Denyati Sanstha, Solapur and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nilgar Denyati Sanstha, Solapur and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Hari Tayade and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rajiv Gandhi Taxi Union, Latur Vs State of Maharashtra and Others

Jayshri Swayam Sahayata Mahila Bachat Gat Through its president Devkabai Sitaram Thakare Vs The State of Maharashtra and others

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Beed Vs State of Maharashtra and Others

Abhang Dadarao Karve and Another Vs State of Maharashtra and Another

Rajesaheb Khabula Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra and Another