The High Court rejected a writ petition seeking a direction to appoint an Administrator over the affairs of a specific entity. The Court held that such a decision lies within the Respondent No.3's domain and cannot be issued merely upon the petitioners' desire.
Writ petition rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP582-14.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No.582/2014 (Suresh Shrawan Tanjale and others .vs. State of Maharashtra and others. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. P.N. Shende, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. D.P. Thakre, Addl. G.P. For Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. A.B. Tikle, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & P.N. Deshmukh, JJ. DATED : February 15, 2016.
2
WP582-14.odt
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can direct the Respondent No.3 to appoint an Administrator.
Whether sufficient grounds exist to interfere with the Respondent No.3's discretion.
Suresh Shrawan Tanjale and others
State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
