The petitioner challenged the rejection of his claim for appointment on compassionate grounds. The Court held that the requirements were not met as the father had only superannuated and did not die in harness or retire due to serious illness.
Writ petition rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP550-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No.550/2016 (Abdul Salik Abdul Aziz .vs. State of Maharashtra and others. )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. S.S. Kashid, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mrs. K.R. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & P.N. Deshmukh, JJ. DATED : January 28, 2016.
The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the rejection of his claim for appointment on compassionate ground.
The petitioner's father had superannuated on 31.10.1996 after attaining the retiral age. The petitioner has thereafter claimed appointment on the compassionate ground.
The appointment on the compassionate ground is to be provided to the legal heirs of a person who either dies in harness or is required to take voluntary retirement on account of serious ailment.
In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. Writ petition is rejected.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a claim for appointment on compassionate grounds is maintainable when the deceased father had only superannuated and not died in harness or retired on account of serious ailment.
Abdul Salik Abdul Aziz
State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
