Writ petition seeking challenge to an order granting extension of service till 62 years was declared infructuous as the impugned order had already been placed on record.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 0205wp5482.15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.5482 OF 2015.
Dr.Ramesh Panjabrao Gan.
..vs..
State of Mah. Thr. Its Secretary and ors.
Mr.S.N.Shende, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.A.Z.Fulzele,AGP for resp.1 to 3. Ms.Tajwar Khan, Adv. for respondent no.4.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND P.N.DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : MAY 02, 2016.
Advocate Shri Shende has produced on record order dated 6th of October, 2015 granting extension till 62 years. It is taken on record and marked as 'X'.
In view of this, it is apparent that challenge is rendered infructuous.
Learned AGP has appeared for respondent nos.1 to 3. Advocate Ms.Khan has appeared for respondent no.4.
Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
Chute.
JUDGE JUDGE
Dr. Ramesh Panjabrao Gan.
State of Mah. Thr. Its Secretary and ors.
B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
P.N.DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
