The petitioner challenged a communication accepting the respondent's offer after a lapse of nearly 11 months. The Court held that no interference was warranted at this stage and rejected the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp5240-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION No.5240 of 2016 Akash Rajendra Musale Vrs.
Western Coalfields Limited, through its Chief General Manager, Chandrapur and another.
OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. R.S. Kurekar, counsel for petitioner.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : 27th September, 2016.
The petition impugns the communication dated 6th November, 2015 addressed by the respondent no. 1 to respondent no. 2 accepting the offer of respondent no. 2. Period of almost 11 months has already lapsed. In that view of the matter, we do not find that any interference at this is warranted.
Petition is thus rejected.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Hirekhan
2
wp5240-16.odt
CERTIFICATE
I certify that this Judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order.
Uploaded by : R.B. Hirekhan.
Uploaded on:28-09-2016.
P.A.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court was warranted to interfere with the communication accepting the respondent's offer representing a lapse of 11 months.
Akash Rajendra Musale
Western Coalfields Limited
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
