A single-paragraph order noting that the challenge raised in the instant writ petition was already decided in a previous judgment (WP No. 4787/2012) and therefore the current petition does not survive; it is disposed of accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of as challenge does not survive past judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp5159.12.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5159 OF 2012
Rajendra Narsingrao Sadhane .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. A.V. Patil, advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Gunale, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.K. Kadam, AGP for the State.
Mr. U.S. Malte, advocate for respondent no. 5.
Mr. Alok Sharma, advocate for respondent no.6.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & P. R. BORA, JJ. DATE : 21st MARCH, 2016.
PER COURT :
( P. R. BORA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Rajendra Narsingrao Sadhane
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
