Allowed

Kranti Jyoti Savitribai Phule Sanstha through Its Officer, Shri. Dilip Nimbarkar v. the Administrative Officer (Education), Shikshan Mandal Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corp. and Anr.

Bombay HC10 Mar 2016WP/5077/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court in Civil Appellate Jurisdiction allowed the withdrawal of Writ Petition No.5077 of 2015 along with a civil application, granting liberty to file an appeal before the School Tribunal. The court expressly refrained from deciding the merits. It directed the Tribunal to consider the pendency of the petition and Section 14 of the Limitation Act regarding condonation of delay.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file an appeal before the School Tribunal; Civil Application dismissed.

Kranti Jyoti Savitribai Phule Sanstha through Its… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

Dixit

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.5077 OF 2015

¶4

Kranti Jyoti Savitribai Phule Sanstha, Pune .… Petitioner V/s. The Administrative Officer (Education), Shikshan Mandal Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Pimpri, Pune & Anr. …. Respondents

¶5

ALONG WITH

¶6

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2287 OF 2015 IN

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO.5077 OF 2015

¶8

Dhananjay Dadasaheb Jagtap …. Applicant In the matter between Kranti Jyoti Savitribai Phule Sanstha, Pune .… Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

The Administrative Officer (Education), Shikshan Mandal Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Pimpri, Pune & Anr. …. Respondents

¶11

Mr. S.A. Sawant for the Petitioner.

¶12

Mr. P.G. Sawant, A.G.P., for Respondent No.1.

¶13

Mr. D.R. More for Respondent No.2.

¶14

Mr. A.V. Anturkar, Sr. Advocate, i/by Ms. Kalyani Tulankar, for the Applicant in Civil Application No.2287 of 2015.

¶15

CORAM : RANJIT MORE &

¶16

DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J.

¶17

DATE : 10TH MARCH 2016.

¶18

1/2

¶19

WP-5077-15-CAW-2287-15.doc

¶20

P.C. :

¶21

Mr. Sawant, learned counsel for the Petitioner, having taken instructions from the Petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this Petition with liberty to challenge the order impugned in this Petition before the School Tribunal. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, and stands dismissed as such.

¶22

It is made clear that, we have not gone into the merits of the matter and in the event such an Appeal is filed by the Petitioner, the same shall be decided in accordance with law. All points and contentions of the respective parties in this regard are kept open.

¶23

Needless to mention, that the Petitioner is entitled to file the Appeal along with application for condonation of delay and while considering the application for condonation of delay, the School Tribunal shall consider the fact of pendency of the Petition in this Court as well as provisions of Section 14 of the Limitation Act.

¶24

In view of the above, Civil Application No.2287 of 2015 pending in the Petition, does not survive and the same is also dismissed.

¶25

[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]

¶26

2/2

¶27

WP-5077-15-CAW-2287-15.doc

Kranti Jyoti Savitribai Phule Sanstha through Its Officer, Shri. Dilip Nimbarkar v. the Administrative Officer (Education), Shikshan Mandal Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corp. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kranti Jyoti Savitribai Phule Sanstha through Its Officer, Shri. Dilip Nimbarkar v. the Administrative Officer (Education), Shikshan Mandal Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corp. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Babanrao Rajaram Shelke Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Anr.

Mr. Babanrao Rajaram Shelke Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Anr.

Shri. Hanmant Siddhram Ambi Koli Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.

Sudhir Kuber Kshirsagar Vs the Chief Officer, Kurduwadi Municipal Council, Kurduwadi Solapur and Ors.

M/S. Vardhaman Construction Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Smt. Shalvi Shantaram Kamble Vs Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation through Its Education Officer, Education Department and Anr.