Disposed

Chavan Magilal Goverdhan v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC5 Feb 2016WP/5011/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition and connected civil applications, the High Court at Aurangabad directed the Chief Executive Officer of the Zilla Parishad to decide a pending application filed by the applicant on its own merits within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad to decide the application on merits within three months.

Chavan Magilal Goverdhan Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.5011 OF 2015

¶4

WITH

¶5

 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8276 OF 2015
& CA/8277/2015

¶6

CHAVAN MAGILAL GOVERDHAN

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶9

Advocate for Applicant : MR. Munde Sambhaji G.
Mr.SB Yawalkar, AGP for Respondents: 1 to 3;
Mr. C D Biradar, Adv. For R/4 & 5.

¶10

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE &
P.R.BORA,JJ.

¶11

DATE :5 th February, 2016.

¶12

PER COURT :

¶13

1)Heard learned Counsel for respective

¶14

parties.

¶15

2)Upon hearing the counsel learned Counsel for
the parties, we are of the opinion that since the
application dated 7th April, 2015 filed by the
petitioner is not decided by the Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad on its own
merits, the said authority deserves to be directed to
decide the same on its own merits.

¶16

3)In the light of above, we direct the Chief
Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad to take
appropriate decision on the said application filed by

¶17

¶18

the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and
preferably within a period of three months from
today.

¶19

4)We grant liberty to the petitioner to submit
all the relevant documents in support of his claim as
also the judgment of this Court and relevant
Government Resolutions, on which, the petitioner
wishes to place reliance within three weeks from
today.

¶20

5)The petitioner to appear before the Chief
Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad on 15th
February, 2016.

¶21

6)It will be open for the concerned authority
to hear the petitioner; peruse the relevant record;
documents, Judgment of this Court; relevant
Government Resolutions and take an appropriate
decision on merits.

¶22

7)With these observations, the petition as
well as the civil applications are disposed of.

¶23

.Parties to act on authenticated copy of this

¶24

order.

¶25

 (P.R.BORA) (S.S.SHINDE)
 JUDGEJUDGE

¶26

bdv/

Chavan Magilal Goverdhan v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chavan Magilal Goverdhan v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Marotirao Gore and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ganesh Pundlikrao Kawarkhe and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Janseva Education Society, Sullali through Its Secretary Vs Ujjwal Uke and Others

Pushpa Santram Surnar Vs State of Maharashtra and Others

Prakash Bhagwanrao Deshmukh Vs State of Maharashtra and Others

Vasudev Niteshkumar Patel Vs the Union of India and Others