This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
WP 4971/05
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.4971/2005
Sangita Uttamrao Sathe.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri K.M. Nagarkar, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri V.S. Badak, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 3.
Shri U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondent no.5.
.....
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA &
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 13.10.2016
ORDER :
1]Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the
petitioner is no more.
2]In the light of above, the writ petition stands
abated and disposed of as such. No costs.
(K.L. WADANE, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
ndk/ c13101616.doc
Sangita Uttamrao Sathe
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court