Court disposed of the PIL by applying the judgment in WP No.541 of 2015 (decided 11/01/2016), holding the question already settled by the Division Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31.wp 486.15.doc
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 486 OF 2015 Madanlal Pukhraj Jain and ors.
.. Petitioners
Vs.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Suresh Dubey, for the Petitioners. Ms.Shobha Ajitkumar, for Respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr.Amit Shastri, AGP for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 07th JULY, 2016
P.C. :
. Learned Counsel for the parties submit that the
question involved in this Petition has already been considered and decided by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of
Vivek Madanlal Jain & ors. Vs. The Municipal Corporation of
Greater Mumbai and ors., in Writ Petition No. 541 of 2015
decided on 11/01/2016 . In view of aforesaid, for the reasons
stated in the said order dated 11/01/2016, this Petition is also disposed of.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vivek Madanlal Jain & ors. Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and ors.Applied¶12
Vivek Madanlal Jain & ors. Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and ors., in Writ Petition No. 541 of 2015 decided on 11/01/2016
Madanlal Pukhraj Jain and ors.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and ors.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
