The High Court of Bombay dismissed Writ Petition No. 4747 of 2010 for want of prosecution, as neither the petitioner nor their counsel appeared despite being notified.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
(WP 4747 of 2010).
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 4747 OF 2010
Prasahntkumar Balasaheb Gawade ….Petitioner Vs.
Union of India and ors. …Respondents
None for the Petitioner Mr. S.S. Kanetkar for Respondent Nos.1 to 4
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
M.S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 29, 2016
P.C. :
the Petitioner nor his counsel was present when the matter was called out. It appears that the Petitioner is not keen in pursuing this petition.
Reserving the right of the Petitioner to exhaust an alternate remedy, which may be available in law.
M.S. SONAK, J.
V.M. KANADE, J.
Prasahntkumar Balasaheb Gawade
Union of India
V.M. Kanade
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
