Two writ petitions were disposed of by disposing the rule on the strength of the petitioner's application for withdrawal, which was not objected to by the respondents. No costs.
Withdrawal allowed; writ petitions disposed of; rule discharged; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 4327.05
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4327 OF 2005
Jai Tulja Bhavani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal through Vice President Rukminibai Laxmanrao Nalwade .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4328 OF 2005
Jai Tulja Bhavani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal through Vice President Rukminibai Laxmanrao Nalwade .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri R. B. Temkar, Advocate h/f Shri P. R. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Ms. P. V. Diggikar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA K. L. WADANE, JJ. DATE : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petitions. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents/State
2 wp 4327.05
does not have any objection. The writ petitions as such are disposed of. Rule discharged. No costs.
[ K. L. WADANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Nov. 16
Jai Tulja Bhavani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal through Vice President Rukminibai Laxmanrao Nalwade
The State of Maharashtra and others
S. V. Gangapurwala
K. L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
