This criminal writ petition concerned an application for premature release. The High Court directed the State to decide the proposal within eight weeks.
Direction to respondent no. 1 to decide the proposal for premature release within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13.4.CWP.43.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 43 OF 2016. (Bharat Dhansingh Rathod .vs. State of Maharashtra & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Ms. S.B. Khobragade, Advocate (appointed) for petitioner, Mr. V.A. Thakare, A.P.P. for respondents,
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. DATED : APRIL 13, 2016.
The proposal of the petitioner for premature release is already forwarded by the Superintendent, Central Prison, Nagpur to the Principal Secretary, Home Department (Prisons), Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.
The petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 1 to decide the proposal as expeditiously as possible and preferably within eight weeks from today.
Fees payable to the learned Counsel appointed for the petitioner are quantified at Rs.1500/-.
Judge Judge
J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proposal for premature release of the petitioner required expeditious consideration by the respondents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bharat Dhansingh Rathod
State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Mrs. Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
