In a petition seeking extension of parole, it was observed that the petitioner had completed his sentence and been released. The court held that no further relief was maintainable.
Petition dismissed; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(7)WP-3908-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3908 OF 2016
Somnath Balasaheb Khopde ... Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
None for the Petitioner. Mr.H.J.Dedia, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI & A. M. BADAR JJ.
DATED : 1ST DECEMBER 2016.
P.C.
1 The petitioner has preferred this petition through Jail, hence, we appoint Advocate Ms.Rohini M. Dandekar, who is on the panel of Advocates of the High Court Legal Services Committee, to represent the petitioner in this petition.
2 Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. By consent, matter is taken up for final hearing.
1/2
Gaikwad RD
(7)WP-3908-16
4 In this view of the matter, nothing survives in this petition, hence, petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged.
J.)
2/2
Gaikwad RD
Somnath Balasaheb Khopde
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
