Single-paragraph order disposing of a writ petition regarding an employee's transfer. The Court held the petition infructuous because the time limit expired after the respondent joined the postsite in New Delhi following a stay order. No substantive relief was discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
skc
21-WP-3819-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3819 OF 2016
Union of India & Anr. .. Petitioners versus Bhagwati Prasad Singh .. Respondent
Ms Neeta Masurkar with Mr. M. M. Chunawala for Petitioners. None for Respondent.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE AND M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 13 JULY 2016
P.C.:
1] The petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. The respondent was transferred from Aurangabad to Dhule. The respondent challenged his transfer by filing an Original Application, before the Central Administrative Tribunal, which was allowed. His order of transfer was set aside.
2] Ms Masurkar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner after taking instructions submits that in the meantime the respondent has been transferred to New Delhi and he has joined the said post.
3] In view of this, the present petition has become infructuous and is accordingly disposed of.
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
(V. M. KANADE, J.)
chandka
1 of 1
Union of India & Anr.
Bhagwati Prasad Singh
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
