Allowed

Sushilabai Sopan Rathod v. the State of Mahrashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC13 Dec 2016WP/3812/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court ordered concerned educational institutions to consider the petitioner's case for compassionate appointment and forward the proposal to the Education Officer in accordance with the Government Resolution dated 31st December, 2002, allowing placement on a waitlist before disposal.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner placed on waitlist and institution directed to forward proposal to Education Officer under G.R. dated 31st December, 2002.

Sushilabai Sopan Rathod Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 wp 3812.11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 3812 OF 2011

¶4

Sushilabai Sopan Rathod, Age : 36 Years, Occu. : Nil, R/o Plot No. 71, Surewadi, Near New Mondha, Aurangabad. .. Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary for Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

¶7

Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad.

¶8

Education Officer, Secondary & Higher Secondary, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad.

¶9

The Secretary/President, Vasantrao Naik Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Jalna Road, Aurangabad.

¶10

Head Mster, Baliram Patil Vidyalaya, N-9, CIDCO, Aurangabad. .. Respondents

¶11

Shri Mangesh Jadhav, Advocate h/f Shri Subodh P. Shah, Advocate for the Petitioner.

¶12

Ms. Rashmi P. Gaur, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Shri Santosh S. Jadhavar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

¶13

2 wp 3812.11

¶14

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. L. WADANE, JJ. DATE : 13TH DECEMBER, 2016.

¶15

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S. V. Gangapurwala, J.) :-

¶16

. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Taken up for final hearing with consent of parties.

¶17

We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent/state and the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

¶18

The petitioner claims to be the wife of the deceased Sopan Gulsing Rathod. The deceased Sopan was working with the respondent No. 5/school since 01.06.2004. During his employment, the husband of the petitioner died. The petitioner is seeking appointment on compassionate ground. It is the case of the respondent that, as per staffing pattern vacancy does not exist in Class C and D category.

¶19

Reliance is placed on Government Resolution dated 31^st December, 2002. As per the said Government Resolution, if vacancy does not exist in the school in which deceased was working, then management shall forward the proposal to the Education Officer. The Education Officer on receipt of said proposal shall keep said candidate seeking appointment on

¶20

3 wp 3812.11

¶21

compassionate ground on the wait list and shall take steps about absorption as per clause 6 of the G. R. dated 31^st December, 2002.

¶22

In the light of the above, the respondent No. 4/institution shall consider the case of the petitioner and forward the proposal to the respondent No. 3 herein. On receipt of the said proposal, the respondent No. 3 shall keep the petitioner in the wait list and follow the procedure as laid down in Clause 6 of the G. R. dated 31^st December, 2002 expeditiously.

¶23

Rule accordingly is made absolute in above terms. No costs.

¶24

Sd/Sd/[ K. L. WADANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]

¶25

bsb/Dec. 16

Sushilabai Sopan Rathod v. the State of Mahrashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushilabai Sopan Rathod v. the State of Mahrashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vasant Ramchandra Puranik Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sanjay Sahebrao Patil Vs Kisan Vidya Prasarak Sanstha Shirpur through President v T Randhir and Ors.

Vithal Uttam Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Jawaharlal Nehru Engineering College, Aurangabad Vs All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi and Others

Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nashik Vs All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi and Another

Usman Nizamoddin Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra and Others