In a writ petition challenging termination of service on expiry of a nine-month appointment, the petitioner was absent. The court found the appointment valid for nine months and dismissed the petition.
Rule discharged, no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
W.P.No.3798/05
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3798 OF 2005
Kalyan S/o Dagduba Yadav Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.N.B.Narwade, advocate for the petitioner absent. Ms.S.S.Raut, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND K.L.WADANE,JJ. Date : 20.10.2016.
PER COURT :
2
W.P.No.3798/05
was for nine months only and on completion of nine months, the services of the petitioner stood terminated. The approval is also granted only for nine months. The appeal is also rightly decided.
(K.L.WADANE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.20.10.2016. asp/office/wp3798.05
3
W.P.No.3798/05
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with the termination of the petitioner's appointment on expiry of the fixed period.
Whether the issuance of a writ lies in the circumstances where the petitioner did not appear for the hearing.
Kalyan S/o Dagduba Yadav
The State of Maharashtra
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
K.L.WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
