This single-paragraph order dismisses the writ petition as infructuous due to subsequent events, without providing a substantive legal proposition or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP3793.13.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3793 OF 2013
Shri Raju Laxman Pachapure … Petitioner
Vs
1. District Deputy Registrar, C.S. Kolhapur Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Nagesh Chavan i/b Tejas S. Ingale for the Petitioner.
Mrs. Sushma Bhende, AGP, for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
Mr. Amol P. Mhatre for the Respondent No.5.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. PATEL, JJ.
WEDNESDAY, 06TH JANUARY, 2016
P.C. :
1 . By virtue of subsequent events, it is conceded that the Writ
Petition is rendered infructuous. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
G.S. PATEL, J.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
SRP 1 / 1
Shri Raju Laxman Pachapure
District Deputy Registrar, C.S. Kolhapur
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
