Respondent 2 was directed to consider and decide the petitioner's proposal expeditiously within eight weeks, substantially redressing the petitioner's grievance regarding approval delays.
Direction to respondent no. 2 to decide the proposal within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3769.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3769 OF 2016
Bazm-e-Adab Educational Society
& others .. PETITIONERS
VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.S. Kazi, advocate for petitioner. Mr. P.S. Patil, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 5th OCTOBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
( K. K. SONAWANE ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the grievance raised by the petitioner regarding delay in approval of proposal was substantially redressed necessitating any order.
Whether the co-relied respondent was directed to expedite a decision on the petitioner's proposal within a specified timeframe.
Bazm-e-Adab Educational Society
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent no. 2
R.M. BORDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
