Petitioners sought leave to withdraw their writ petition to pursue an alternate remedy. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with contentions left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 357 OF 2016
MR. WILLIAM ROSARIO FERNANDES AND 4 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF GOA, THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 12 ORS., ... Respondents
Mr. Preetam Talaulikar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Mr. A. Prabhudesai, Additional Govt. Advocate for the respondents No.1 to 5.
Coram:F. M. REIS & K. L. WADANE, JJ. Date:23rd March, 2016
P.C.:
Shri Preetam Talaulikar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, upon instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the above petition as the petitioners desire to pursue an alternate remedy. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. All contentions of the petitioners are left open.
K. L. WADANE, J. F. M. REIS, J.
ssm.
Mr. William Rosario Fernandes
State of Goa
F. M. REIS
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
