Petitioner approached the High Court withdrawing his petition to file a fresh application for discharge. Petition withdrawn with liberty.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application for discharge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YBG
1
34-wp-353-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.353 OF 2016
Najeeb Suleman Mulla .. Petitioner - Versus - The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr. Bhavesh M. Thakur i/b. Rahul Arote for petitioner.
CORAM : V.M.KANADE & MS.NUTAN D.SARDESSAI, JJ. DATE : 17th November 2016.
P.C.
1] Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that since charge
sheet is filed he intends to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh application for discharge. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. All contentions of the petitioner and respondents are kept open.
(MS. NUTAN D.SARDESSAI, J) (V.M.KANADE, J)
Najeeb Suleman Mulla
The State of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
Ms. Nutan D. Sarmessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
