The High Court rejected the writ petition filed by a convicted petitioner who challenged a High Court order suspending substantive sentences while keeping conviction intact, holding no reason for interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 9-wp3362.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3362 OF 2016
DIGAMBAR BHASKARRAO ALANDKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr.V.D.Gunale, advocate for petitioner
Mr.S.G.Karlekar, AGP for respondent no.1 - State
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 02, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard.
2]Admittedly, the petitioner has been convicted
in a criminal case. Being aggrieved by the
conviction, the petitioner has preferred an appeal
before the High Court. The High Court has
admitted that appeal and suspended the substantive
sentences. Admittedly, the conviction is not
suspended. Therefore, we do not find any reason
to interfere in the impugned order.
2 9-wp3362.odt
3] Hence, the Writ Petition stands rejected.[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.][S.S. SHINDE, J.]
kbp
DIGAMBAR BHASKARRAO ALANDKAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court