In a writ petition, the petitioner sought directions for a decision on a Sanitary Napkin proposal under the SFURTI Programme. The High Court disposed of the petition as the scheme had concluded on 31.3.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
918 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3265 OF 2015
RASHTRIYA AUNUSUCHI JATI JAMATI APLASANKHANYANK GRAMIN VIKASH MANDALS AMAR INDUST VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. P.S. Pawar
Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S.B. Deshpande, ASG. Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 : Mr. M.G. Deokate.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE :12TH JULY , 2016.
PER COURT:
1] Mr.Pawar, learned counsel submits that under the Scheme promulgated by the Khadi and village Industries Commission, the petitioner submitted a proposal for Sanitary Napkin under the scheme SFURTI PROGRAMME. However, no decision was taken on the said proposal. The petitioner seeks directions against the respondents to take decision on the said proposal (Exhibit B).
2] Mr. Deokate, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and 3 submits that the said scheme was in force till 31st March, 2015 and it has co me to and end on 31st March, 2015.
3] Mr. Deshpande, learned ASG submits that the said scheme was meant for traditional industries and the aspect of traditional industries is also defined under the scheme itself. The proposal submitted by the petitioner could not come within the ambit and purview of the said scheme.
918 sr. no..odt
{2}
4] As submitted by the respondents, that the scheme itself has
come to an end on 31.3.2015, the relief claimed in the petition of directing the respondents to consider his proposal, would not survive.
5] Considering the above, Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
[K.K. SONAWANE] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
Rashtriya Aunusuchi Jati Jamati Aplasankhanyank Gramin Vikash Mandals Amar
Union of India
S.V. Gangapurwala
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
