Petitioner holding an officiating post sought further continuation. Due to low seniority and lack of statutory right to the post, the Court held it declined to interfere and disposed of the petition.
Nulla cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
1406wp3203.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.3203 OF 2016
(Mrs. Rekha w/o Wardharaj Pilley vs. Education Officer (Secondary) and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri V.A. Dhabe, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri N.R. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 and 2.
Shri P. Shende, Advocate for respondent no.3.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATED : JUNE 14, 2016
The petitioner holding a post on officiating basis wants further continuation.
Admittedly, in seniority list, petitioner is quite below, i.e. at serial no.18 and there are several persons senior to her.
In this situation, as petitioner does not have any right to post, we are not inclined to interfere in the writ jurisdiction. Keeping all rival contentions open, we dispose of the petition. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, holding an officiating post in low seniority, is entitled to continuation in post in writ jurisdiction.
Rekha w/o Wardharaj Pilley
Education Officer (Secondary)
DHARMADHIKARI
JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
