Dismissed

The Union of India Thr. General Manager, South Easter Central Railway, Bilaspur and Others v. Shashi Bhushan Hinwar, Commercial Clerk

Bombay HC18 Oct 2016WP/3194/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellant appeal against the Nagpur Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, which allowed the respondent's original application regarding disability-acquired pay protection. The High Court found no perversity in the Tribunal's view and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the writ petition and no order as to costs.

The Union of India Thr. General Manager… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

wp3194.16.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3194/2016

¶4

The Union of India through General Manager, Bilaspur and others ..vs.. Shashi Bhushan Hinwar

¶5

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

¶7

Mr. V. M. Gadkari, Advocate for petitioner.

¶8

CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 18, 2016

¶9

The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by judgment and order dated 04.09.2015 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur thereby allowing the Original Application filed by the respondent. The learned tribunal, while relying on the judgments in Kuna Singh vs. Union of India and anr.; 2003 I CLR 766 SC; Shivaji s/o Vishwanath Dongre vs. State of Maharasthra & Ors., 2006 I CLR 496; Edward Swalin D'Cunha vs. Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities & anr, 2010 I CLR 954; Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd., Chennai vs. K Ravichandran, LLJ 2005 Page 78, and Dhammadip Bhaurao Mankar, Yeotmal vs. UOI, Ministry of Coal and Ors.; 2011 (III) CLR 976, held that the person who has acquired disability during the employment, needs to be treated differently and the employer should take all necessary steps to protect his pay and status when giving him an alternate employment.

¶10

The learned Tribunal found that the applicant before acquiring disability, he was already placed in the provisional panel for promotion to the post of Loco Pilot with a Grade Pay of Rs.4200/-. It is further found that had he been sent for training before acquiring disability,he would have been promoted.

¶11

wp3194.16.odt

¶12

¶13

In that view of the matter, it cannot be said that the view taken by the learned tribunal is perverse or impossible warranting interference in the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs.

¶14

JUDGE JUDGE

¶15

kahale

The Union of India Thr. General Manager, South Easter Central Railway, Bilaspur and Others v. Shashi Bhushan Hinwar, Commercial Clerk

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Union of India Thr. General Manager, South Easter Central Railway, Bilaspur and Others v. Shashi Bhushan Hinwar, Commercial Clerk

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul S/O Mahadeo Wankhede Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Environment Dept. Govt. of Maharashtra Mumbai

Kanthiram S/O Narayan Tatte Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Ministry of Urban Development Mumbai and Others

M/S. K.S.R. Transport Co. Chandrapur Thr. Manish S/O. Krishnakumar Chadda Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Chandrapur Circle

Mr. Mohammad Farhan Khan S/O Lat Abdul Quddus Khan and 2 Others Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Health Department, Mumbai and 2 Others

The State of Maha., through Principal Sect., Public Health Dept., Bombay and Others Vs Dr. Arun Ramchandra Thosar

Green India Power Energy Prop. Mubarak Rashid Sheikh Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary National Informatics Centre Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others