High Court rejected a writ petition challenging the allotment of a petroleum dealership, noting the process was complete and commercial operations commenced.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3095 OF 2012
(Smt. Baby wd/o Shankarrao Deshmukh Vs. The Union of India & ors.)
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders
Shri P.B. Rakhunde, Advocate holding for Shri S.B. Bhapkar, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.B. Deshpande, Assistant Solicitor General for the Union of India Shri A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for respondent No.3.
CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED : 6th January, 2016.
fmp/wp3095.12
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Baby wd/o Shankarrao Deshmukh
The Union of India
Petroleum Corporation
R.M. BORDE
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
