The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, disposed of a writ petition by leaving the option of an alternate remedy open for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3033.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3033 OF 2016
Arvind s/o Sambhaji Suryawanshi .. PETITIONER
VERSUS State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. D.R. Pawar, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.S. Dande, AGP for the State. Mr. B.N. Patil, advocate for respondent no. 4.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
It is open for the petitioner to avail of the alternate remedy available in law. It is informed by learned counsel for respondent no. 4 that petitioner has already avail of alternate remedy and has presented a civil suit. Keeping the option to avail of alternate remedy available in law open for the petitioner, writ petition stands disposed of.
( K. K. SONAWANE ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Arvind s/o Sambhaji Suryawanshi
State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
