Petitioners sought permission to withdraw criminal writ petition. Court granted permission. Trial contentions kept open. No merits considered.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition. Contention on merits kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-3033-15
upk
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3033 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Mr.Amit Desai, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Pawan Mali for the Petitioners. Mr.S.K.Shinde, PP a/w Mr.K.V.Saste,APP for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 25 AUGUST 2016
P.C.:
. After arguing the Petition for some time, the
learned senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the Petition.
withdrawn. All contentions on merits of the trial are kept open.
(A.A. SAYED, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
Petitioners
Respondent No.1
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court