The petitioner, personally present, sought and obtained permission to withdraw the criminal writ petition. All contentions were expressly kept open. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crwp3032
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3032 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Ms Naziya Khan for the Petitioner
Ms S.V.Sonawane, APP for the State
CORAM :A.S.OKA AND
R.D.DHANUKA,JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 8, 2016
P.C.
1The learned counsel for the
petitioner on instructions of the
petitioner who is personally present in
the Court seeks permission to withdraw
thispetition.Accordingly,the
petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
However, all contentions raised in this
petition are expressly kept open.
(R.D.DHANUKA,J)(A.S.OKA,J.)
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
State
A.S.Oka
R.D.Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court