Dismissed

Awadhnarayan S Rajbhar v. Sigma Paints Ltd. and Anr.

Bombay HC15 Jul 2016WP/301/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, whose employment stopped due to the respondent establishment closing, had a dispute mediated. With mediation failing on reinstatement, the respondent deposited compensation. This court held the amount adequate and dismissed the petition. PF/pension dues remain claimable separately.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw deposited sum of Rs.1,18,252/- with accrued interest.

Awadhnarayan S Rajbhar Vs Sigma Paints Ltd. and Anr. — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

WP 301-07.doc

¶2

1/2

¶3

Chittewan

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.301 OF 2007

¶6

Awadhnarayan S. Rajbhar ... Petitioner Versus M/s Sigma Paints And Another … Respondents

¶7

Mr. T.R. Yadav i/b Seema Chopda for the Petitioner. Mr. S.C. Naidu i/b C.R. Naidu & Co. for Respondent No.1.

¶8

CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J.

¶9

DATE : 15 JULY 2016.

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

. As recorded in my last order dated 17 March 2016, the disputes between the parties were sought to be mediated. Though mediation has failed, learned Counsel for the Respondents made an offer on the last occasion to deposit a sum of Rs.1,18,252/- before the Prothonotary & Senior Master, pending the disposal of the Petition. The Respondents have, accordingly, deposited the amount on 6 April 2016. Since, admittedly, Respondent No.1 establishment is closed, the dispute between the parties, which originally involved the Petitioner's case for reinstatement with consequential benefits, now pertains only to compensation. This Court has already recorded the lack of clarity in this behalf (i.e. as to working out of such compensation) on the part of the Petitioner. In fact, that was the reason why, in the first place, the matter was referred to the mediator by this Court. Taking an overall view of the matter, the compensation of Rs.1,18,252/-, which was worked out in the mediation proceedings and

¶12

WP 301-07.doc

¶13

2/2

¶14

Chittewan

¶15

which is recorded in the mediation report made to this Court, can be said to adequately compensate the Petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of by permitting the Petitioner to withdraw the sum deposited by the Respondents before this Court as noted above with accrued interest, if any. It is also clarified that any provident fund and family pension dues that the Petitioner is entitled to, may be claimed by him over and above the amount of compensation provided in this order. The Court appreciates the efforts on the part of the mediator for undertaking the exercise.

¶16

(S.C.GUPTE, J.)

Awadhnarayan S Rajbhar v. Sigma Paints Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Awadhnarayan S Rajbhar v. Sigma Paints Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Db Reality Limited Vs Mahal Pictures Pvt. Ltd. and 7 Ors.

Db Reality Limited Vs Mahal Pictures Pvt. Ltd. and 7 Ors.

Mumbai Mazdoor Sabha Vs Kiran Rasiklal Mehta

Nazirkhan Sherkhan Vs the Metal Printers

Special Land Acquisition Officer (4) Vs Shamshida Wd/O. Mohd. Iqbal Abdul Hamid and 4 Ors. Legal Hairs (Applicant)

Mr. Sachin Bhupal Bargale and Ors. Vs M/S. Star Flexi-Pack Industries (I)Pvt. Ltd. through Its Executive Director