Writ petition by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the Income Tax Settlement Commission was dismissed for non-prosecution as no advocate appeared to support it during hearing.
Interim reliefs granted earlier were vacated; petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
299-00-wp=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 299 OF 2000
Commissioner of Income Tax, City XIII, Mumbai
.. Petitioner
v/s.
The Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr. .. Respondents
None for the petitioner
Mrs. Shobha Jagtiyani i/b D.M. Harish & Co. for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.th JULY, 2016.
P.C.
appeared in support of the petition. Therefore, it was kept back to 3.00 p.m.
and the petition itself is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
1 of 1
Uday S. Jagtap
Commissioner of Income Tax, City XIII, Mumbai
The Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr.
M.S. Sanklecha
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
