Writ petition disposed of as infructuous because the relief sought was rendered unnecessary by an order passed by the Hon'ble Minister for Revenue & Forest dated 10th March, 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 2974 - 14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 2974 OF 2014
Anil Achhut Masurkar ….Petitioner Vs. Narayan Krushna Sawant and Ors. …..Respondents
Mr. Jessy Joseph i/b. Mr. S.M. Sabrad for the Petitioner None for Respondent No.1
Mr. C.P. Yadav – AGP for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 22, 2016
PC.
. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner
submits that the relief claimed in terms of prayer clause (b), which reads as under:
“(b) That by an appropriate writ, order or direction, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to hold an inquiry against the Respondent No. 2 for having failed to take any action of recovery of an amount of Rs.20,56,910/- imposed upon the
1 / 2
WP 2974 - 14
Respondent No. 1 pursuant to order dated 30.11.2010, passed in Remand Appeal No. 17/Khani /SR -15/2010.”
has become infructuous, in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Minister for Revenue & Forest dated 10th March, 2016. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of as such.
Sd/Sd/[M. S. SONAK, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
2 / 2
Anil Achhut Masurkar
Narayan Krushna Sawant
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
