The writ petition was disposed of due to subsequent developments where an agreement for permanent alternate accommodation was executed and transit accommodation was arranged for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh
904-WP-2943.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2943 OF 2014
L. Palaniswamy Chettiyar .... Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Others .... Respondents
Mr. Mahadev D. Pokale for the Petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pimple for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Vijay D. Patil for Respondent No.3. Mr. Umashanker Upadhyay, AGP, for the Respondent
-State.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2016
P.C:
In the light of the subsequent developments and particularly that an agreement for permanent alternate accommodation has been executed between the petitioner and respondent No.5 and arrangement is also made to enable the petitioner to occupy an accommodation styled as transit accommodation pending the redevelopment of the subject-
Page 1 of 2
904-WP-2943.2014.doc
suresh
property, and by taking on record true copies of the agreement and related documents, we dispose of this writ petition as nothing survives in the same in the light of these developments.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
L. Palaniswamy Chettiyar
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Others
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
