The Court held that a writ petition for reinstatement of a workman is infructuous upon the death of the Respondent and disposed of the petition.
The petition was disposed of as it is infructuous due to the death of the Respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2927-12.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2927 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2321 OF 2013 (Not on Board)
Lumax Auto Technologies Ltd. ...Petitioner vs Shri Gopal Budhaprasad Sharma ...Respondent
Ms. Ambreen Saheed, i/b. MDP & Partners, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Anvil S. Kalekar, i/b. Jaydeep Deo, for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATED: APRIL 27, 2016
P.C. :
. The subject matter of the present petition is reinstatement of the Respondent workman. Learned Counsel for the Respondent workman submits that the Respondent has expired. In view of this, the petition is clearly infructuous. The same is disposed of. As for the wages during the interregnum under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, all payments have been duly made in respect of the Respondent workman in pursuance of orders passed by this Court in Civil Application/s taken out in the present petition.
( S.C. GUPTE, J. )
Pg 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for reinstatement of a deceased workman is maintainable.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
NoneReferred
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lumax Auto Technologies Ltd.
Shri Gopal Budhaprasad Sharma
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
