The High Court of Bombay dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear before the court when the matter was called for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2897 OF 2015
DATTU NARAYAN KALASKAR AND OTHERS VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. P.G. Borade Advocate for Respondent nos. 4 to 6 : Mr. D.A. Karnik h/f Mr. Dhage Vivek J.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: February 09, 2016
PER COURT :-
When the Petition is called out for hearing, none appears for the petitioners. In the circumstances, the Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
( P.R. BORA, J. )
( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
sga/-
Dattu Narayan Kalaskar and Others
State of Maharashtra and Others
S.S. Shinde
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
