This writ petition under Article 226 challenging a decree under Section 151 CPC was allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally by the High Court of Bombay.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally and dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
909.wp.289-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition NO. 289 OF 2016
M/S ESSEL CORPORATE RESOURCES PVT. LTD. AND ANR
...Petitioners
Versus
MR. HARPREET SINGH THIND
...Respondent
Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud i/b. ALMT Legal, for the Petitioners. Ms. Preeti Brahmania, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J.
DATE : 29th MARCH, 2016
P.C.
1. Heard Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud, learned Counsel for
the petitioners and Ms. Preeti Brahmania, learned counsel for respondent, at length.
Exhibit-11 in Summary Suit No.3927/2010. By that order, the learned trial Judge allowed the application made by the
1 / 2
2
909.wp.289-16.doc
respondent/plaintiff under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'CPC') for recalling the order dated 6.7.2015. By order dated 6.7.2015, the learned trial Judge permitted the petitioners, hereinafter referred to as the 'defendants', to file additional written statement on amended plaint.
Deshmane (PS)
2 / 2
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/S ESSEL CORPORATE RESOURCES PVT. LTD.
MR. HARPREET SINGH THIND
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
